Reasonable compensation is the single most litigated issue in the S corporation arena. A shareholder-employee who performs services must take reasonable W-2 wages before distributions; underpay, and the IRS recharacterizes distributions as wages, with back tax, penalties, and interest.
The statutory and regulatory foundation
§ 3121(a) defines wages broadly for FICA. Under Treas. Reg. § 31.3121(d)-1(b), a corporate officer who performs more than minor services is an employee whose compensation is subject to employment taxes. Rev. Rul. 74-44 established that the Service will recharacterize "dividends" paid in lieu of salary as wages. The question is never whether a working shareholder takes reasonable compensation, only how much.
What "reasonable" means
There is no safe harbor and no statutory percentage, the popular "60/40 split" appears nowhere in the Code, regulations, or case law. Reasonableness is a facts-and-circumstances determination. The factors most frequently weighed: the shareholder's training and experience; the nature, extent, and scope of duties; time and effort devoted; the relationship of compensation to gross and net income; comparable pay at similar firms and to non-owner employees; dividend history; and whether a formula was used.
The leading cases
Watson v. United States (8th Cir. 2012) is the landmark: a CPA paid himself $24,000 while taking ~$200,000 in distributions; the court upheld reclassification to roughly $91,044 based on objective valuation evidence. Glass Blocks Unlimited v. Comm'r (T.C. Memo 2013-180) confirmed that even an unprofitable company must pay reasonable compensation when the owner performs services and takes funds out.
A defensible methodology
- Define the services. Catalog every role the shareholder actually performs (management, sales, production, bookkeeping).
- Value each role. Use compensation data (cost approach) for what it would cost to hire each role out.
- Allocate time. Apportion the owner's hours across the roles.
- Document. Keep a contemporaneous file with data sources, the analysis, and the board's compensation resolution.
Common exam failures
Zeroed-out or rule-of-thumb salaries with no underlying analysis. A genuine, documented study is the difference between defending the position and conceding it.
Don't trust. Verify.
Don't take our word for it. Click any citation in this article to read it straight from the source.
- IRC § 3121(a)Wages
- Treas. Reg. Treas. Reg. § 31.3121(d)-1(b)
- Rev. Rul. 74-44Revenue Ruling 74-44
- Watson v. United States
- Glass Blocks Unlimited v. Comm'r

